On Monday 26 October 2009, Phil Longstaff wrote: > On October 26, 2009 04:39:52 pm Christian Stimming wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 22. Oktober 2009 18:34 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > > No dev has given feedback on this patch in two weeks. I presume they > > > are all too busy right now with other stuff. > > > > Right, that's the way it is over here. > > > > > Just to prevent this patch from getting lost in the mailing list > > > archives, I have created a bugreport for it and attached it there as > > > well: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599324 > > > > Thanks a lot for this. Indeed the patches in bugzilla are somehow "better > > on the radar". Currently I try to apply the bugzilla patches every other > > week, so I'll get to them eventually unless anyone else is faster than me > > this time. > > Geert, > > yes, creating a bug report and attaching a patch or attaching a patch to an > existing report is best. When you create the attachment, there is a > "patch" checkbox which flags the attachment with even more visibility. I > checked that checkbox on your 2 patches. > Thanks for that. I knew about the patch checkbox already, but obviously forgot to use it when creating the patches.
Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel