John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes: >> I think it's PROBABLY safe to remove these now. >> > > Hmm. That means that it would need to be thoroughly tested. Do the > current tests provide sufficient coverage to make sure that without is > OK? Alternatively, if I do a build against Guile-1.6.0 and the gnucash > srfis aren't pulled in, is that good enough?
I think testing against 1.6.0 would be good enough. I don't think the rest of the tests are sufficient. > Regards, > John Ralls -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warl...@mit.edu PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel