Thanks, John, for providing answers to the sourceforge questions. Looks good to 
me!

Christian 

> Am 19.08.2016 um 19:05 schrieb John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us>:
> 
> Here we go again. I propose the answers below to the "interview" questions. 
> Any additions or corrections?
> 
> Regards,
> John Ralls
> 
>> On Aug 18, 2016, at 3:58 PM, Joan Uy Ang <joan.nad...@slashdotmedia.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Congratulations! You’ve been voted as the SourceForge Community Choice 
>> Project of the Month for September. Normally we do an exclusive interview 
>> with the winning project but since you already have one from last year 
>> (https://sourceforge.net/blog/march-2015-community-choice-project-of-the-month-gnucash/),
>>  we will simply release a feature of GnuCash on our blog which will link to 
>> your previous interview.
>> 
>> If however you'd like to give us any updates on the current status of your 
>> project, it would be most welcome. 
>> 
>> Some questions you could answer:
>> 
>>    • What significant changes have occurred with your project since you were 
>> voted Project of the Month in March last year?
> 
> Lots of bug fixes. We're in the middle of our 3-year development cycle.
> 
>>    • Have any of your project goals changed since then?
> 
> No. 
> 
>>    • What project goals for the year have you achieved so far?
> 
> We have a somewhat longer horizon, two development cycles or 8 years from the 
> last release, for our current goals. To recap, those are to rewrite the core 
> library in modern C++, to better enforce the MVC pattern, and to make GnuCash 
> a database application rather than an application that can use a database as 
> an object store. The eventual user benefits will be multi-user operation over 
> the net and the ability to support more platforms--in particular mobile and 
> Chrome.
> 
>>    • What can we look forward to with GnuCash?
> 
> We've already got some new features ready for the next stable series expected 
> in December of next year, and we expect that 2.8 will be a substantial 
> stability improvement thanks to the C++ rewrite.
> 
>>    • Is there anything else we should know?
> 
> No, I think that's it.
>> If you could respond with answers to these questions within 7 days, that 
>> would be great.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,and we look forward to your response!
>> 
>> Joan Nadene
>> SourceForge Community Coordinator
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel


_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to