David, It seems the edits you committed took care of most of the spelling/grammatical errors I noticed. I fixed a remaining one in the External Documentation section.
Concerning content, do we still need to point to the three ‘particular enhancement’ discussions at the bottom of the page? If anything, perhaps they should be listed under Old Discussions since all three of them have been implemented and their pages are dated by several years to a decade. I’d also think the Concept Guide link should perhaps have more to do with Documentation than an application feature. Perhaps it should be under Developing Documentation, or even not on this page at all and linked from the Developing Documentation page. Just a thought. Regards, Adrien > On Jun 14, 2017, at 9:01 AM, David T. <sunfis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback. I’ve modified the page and incorporated most of your > changes. If there are specific typos or grammatical errors, could you either > fix them or point them out? My eyes aren’t what they used to be! > > David > >> On Jun 14, 2017, at 12:02 AM, Adrien Monteleone >> <adrien.montele...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I see a few typos and grammatical errors, so I wouldn’t say it’s ready for >> publication yet. >> >> As for organization, perhaps change [Scripting and Programming] to >> [“Advanced” Usage] or [“Advanced” Usage - Scripting & Programming] >> >> I’d expect to find the info on Logging and Stack Trace to be either under >> Help or Filing Bugs. You could then probably eliminate the odd sounding >> ‘Error Seaching’ (sic) heading. >> >> Also the way [Getting Involved in the Project] reads, the rest of the >> material that follows should be nested under it, which might be odd. Perhaps >> just keep the sentence but remove that heading entirely. It doesn’t seem >> necessary. Or since all of those topics including developing code are >> "getting involved” replace the main heading—[Developing for GnuCash] with >> [Getting Involved in the Project] or something similar like [Contributing to >> GnuCash]. The other headings and text can remain as is. >> >> Overall though, this is laid out much better than the current version. >> >> -Adrien >> >> >>> On Jun 13, 2017, at 11:17 AM, David T. via gnucash-devel >>> <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Two weeks ago, after a flurry of discussion in this list, I and Don >>> (doncram) worked to put together a modified wiki landing page, which was >>> placed as a sandbox page at https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GnuCash/sandbox >>> <https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GnuCash/sandbox>. >>> >>> Since that time, there has been no further activity on any front, and >>> although two weeks is not a very long time to let this season (as it were), >>> I do wonder whether the Developer team has any sense of what amount of time >>> constitutes “the right” amount of time for such a proposal to sit before >>> the changes are sent live. I’d like to get the page pushed out before it >>> gets lost in the mists of time… >>> >>> David >>> >>> @doncram: once it’s time to move this along, how exactly does one convert >>> the sandbox to its real counterpart? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gnucash-devel mailing list >>> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org >>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gnucash-devel mailing list >> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org >> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
