> On May 22, 2018, at 4:37 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: > > Hi, > > Based on the back-and-forth with John and I yesterday, I think there is > only one open question: What do we want to do (if anything), about the > gnome bugzilla extension (Gnome)AttachmentStatus? > > We have three options: > > 1) Nothing -- just drop and ignore the data > 1a) Almost Nothing -- drop the actual status data but translate the > history to something else (which might be a bit confusing) > 2) Create a custom flag for the bug -- this probably is not right > 3) Up-port the extension to our BZ > > I should note that as far as I can tell, I ONLY see this data in the > history; it does not look like this status has been delivered in the data. > > Personally I'm for either 1 or 1a. For 1a we just need to decide what > to translate it to in the history. Right now I put in "submitter", but > we could choose "status". Although it might just be cleaner to remove > that history. > > What say you?
Option 2 should be create a flag on the attachment. If we want to keep the status information this would be the easy way to do it. See https://bugzilla.readthedocs.io/en/5.0/administering/flags.html and https://bugzilla.readthedocs.io/en/5.0/using/editing.html#flags I've already said that I prefer option 1 and why. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel