Op dinsdag 3 juli 2018 02:57:50 CEST schreef Christopher Lam: > Hi Stephen, Dave &al > > Thank you - > > Dave - the changes are merely cosmetic therefore easy. > > It sounds there are still 2 desired presentational types - (1) Dave's > approach = *recursive-bal* - 'parent' accounts generally collect their > children account amounts; if they also have their own amount, the latter is > rendered on the next line, indented as a child account. (2) Stephen's > approach = *multilevel-bal* - parent accounts' amounts are hidden unless > they exist. > I'm not sure I understand the difference here. Isn't this expressing the same thing twice in different ways ? Perhaps I'm missing a subtlety in the English language...
Or is the difference whether the totals are shown above or below the children ? Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
