Op maandag 6 augustus 2018 11:35:43 CEST schreef c.holterm...@gmx.de: > Then you speak of c++ GncNumeric. As I understand you are moving the > source > from c to c++. So the python bindings need to reflect that. That sounds > like > another piece of work. Is there imminent need for change there ? Chances > of > breaking changes ?
We're indeed converting the internals of gnucash (that part we refer to as "libgnucash" among developers) to c++. As long as parts of gnucash as a whole still depend on the c interface that will continue to exist as a wrapper around the c++ code. So the C interface will probably still be around for a couple of years. So there is still quite some time available to port the python bindings. I suggested this as an interesting project in my previous mail. Thinking about this some more it probably only makes sense when all of the objects that are being wrapped are converted to C++. I guess the wrapper would otherwise have to wrap both the C and the C++ interface to provide full functionality, which sounds a bit awkward. A first experiment to get an idea of what to expect on the other hand may still be useful. Regards, Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
