Hi David, at first thanks for starting with this task.
Am 04.09.2018 um 16:43 schrieb David T. via gnucash-devel: > Now, on a meta-level, I think the primary headings here might be better > arranged as follows: > > 1. General Questions Perhaps the title should be more specific. Abstract About the project, how {this page is organized [missing]}, howw to get help (and provide required information, and give something back (from feedback to patches). > [move “Accounting Questions” to this section] Please do not, I see “Accounting Questions” more or less as "Off topic" there are spcefic websites which can answer such questions according the local law. For me there is a logical sequence: Install, configure/customize, use. > 2. Installation > 3. Using GnuCash [moved ahead of cunfiguring] No, before you should configure/customize your installation. > 4. Configuring and Managing > [Move “Customizing" questions from current section 8 to this section] yes > 5. Troubleshooting Please insert no separate Troubleshooting. It would lead to duplicate sections. > 6. Exporting and Importing Data > 7. Business Features In theory 6 & 7 are subsections of 3 > [Move entire Developing GnuCash section of questions to the pages > established for Developers] No, there should be only one FAQ. Because it might not interest most users , it is at the bottom. I am pretty sure, if we would break the FAQ in parts we would end with a bunch of duplicated sections. > I welcome input and feedback. As you have already started, I would prefer - like for patches - smaller changesets (move section x into...). Diff is not very smart and it is now almost impossible to see what really changed. Why did you remove the table to the official docs? Many questions are already answered there. > David Frank _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel