Op zaterdag 2 februari 2019 14:31:43 CET schreef Hendrik Boom: > > On 2/1/19 5:36 AM, Wm via gnucash-devel wrote: > > > [2] as long as the transaction stream balances the actual numbers > > > don't matter (their will be occasions where the numbers are important > > > but these tend to be number extremes related to commodities rather > > > than anyone using gnc to do a Mr Putin vs Mr Trump sports bet).? In > > > most cases multiplying any matching numbers by the same semi-random > > > should produce a good file for examination so long as it is done > > > consistently [4] > > If the numbers in the file are integers times some account or > currency-dependent unit, then just clculationg the greatest common > divisor of all the obfuscated numbers will give a good guess as to the > semirandom multiplier.
Do you think that still is possible if a different random number was used for each transaction ? (That's how I understood Wm's suggestion) Each transaction will have it's own random number. So for transaction A all splits may have been multiplied with 450, for Transaction B all numbers may have been multiplied by 500. Regards, Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel