I had a similar problem with windows10. At higher resolutions, text seemed 
“fuzzy” and some characters appeared to be missing pixels.  I chalked it up to 
lesser resolutions from my integrated video chipset.  

But... interestingly, my O/S went south on me. I decided I had had enough of 
Widows and converted to Linux. Poof! Problem gone. I’m wondering if it’s just a 
problem with Windows.  I would check to see if your video card can handle high 
enough resolutions, or if your O/S is limited to lower resolutions.  I know.... 
not much in the way of help, but I figured I’d share my experience in the hope 
you can benefit somehow.

Sincerely , 
Carmelo Pagán 

> On Feb 4, 2018, at 2:43 PM, Usar <foren-sh...@mailbox.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello GnuCash Community,
> 
> I recently bought a new monitor which allows for 3840x2160 pixels. I love
> the sharpness, alas some programs dont scale very well. It seems to me that
> gnucash is one of these programs who look rather f***** up with this many
> pixels.
> 
> Is there any way I can have sharp fonts with my setup?
> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-User-f1415819.html
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-user mailing list
> gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
> If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
> https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
> -----
> Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
> You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to