On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 13:45:30 +0200, Kiefer, Sascha said: > Well, as far as i see there is no difference between the MIME format of > rfc2015 and rfc3156.
Correct, 3156 has only minor clarifications. > So, what is right? > RFC like: > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5 > protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=bar Correct. > Or (enigmail like) > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="foo" Wrong. IIRC this is a workaround due to problems with the Mozilla code. Enigmail users should nag the Mozilla hackers to provide a working and useful interface to MIME and don't hardcode S/MIME. > But what should i generate? The first of course. Shalom-Salam, Werner _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users