-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Robert
On Wednesday 3 March 2010 at 6:52:17 PM, you wrote: > It is not reasonable that their definition of privacy will overlap with > yours, no. I don't get to define what "privacy" means for anyone other > than me. You don't get to define what "privacy" means for anyone other > than you. > Since there is no shared definition of privacy, there can be no > reasonable assumption that people who use and promote what *you define > to be* privacy-enhancing software will value and respect privacy > *according to your definition*. A good point, well made. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com What's another word for synonym? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBS462J6ipC46tDG5pAQr/RgP/UNZPYOePwKIZ1/wlu6HXKHwMfrN86i7G hOq8Ms2LYrDf3hfXBgw03/HGFUKjeJzKDDdvpe8dwl49dvvRe/kiKttQfZZLXyBk P17ndPxkyzRW4FlUU2DEbQTfKdmhjOjmpQQuxkSJt15v1Qykt51SvO93yiRRMwO6 qY3e88Mxb2Q= =uprh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users