On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 13:22, power...@powerman.name said: > I don't think so. Every project encrypt it backups with different > passwords (needed for security), and right now I can keep just several > dozens of passwords, but with public keys I'll need to keep several dozens > of .gnupg directories instead, which is harder to manage.
You would use the same keyring for all users. The option --homedir might be useful for this. > I wonder what is physical sense of this number? Is it safe to hardcode one > number for all user accounts on same server (many servers)? It is a kind of iteration count for the passpharse; i.e. how often to hash the passphrase. This is to mitigate dictionary attacks. A fixed value is fine. > P.S. But I still think much more clear solution is just add option to > suppress warning message and let gpg start own copy of gpg-agent when it We could use --quiet to suppress this warning. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users