-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Thursday 10 June 2010 at 4:53:43 PM, in <mid:87bpbivq7s....@servo.finestructure.net>, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:32:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor > <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >> And i should probably add that it is indeed an infinitesimal drop in the >> bucket compared to the other spam i receive; i'm not concerned about it. > Not to mention that the bother of a couple of extra > spams is completely dwarfed by the benefit of having > the public keyserver network. This is true, but it would be perfectly feasible to have a working network of public keyservers that did not reveal email addresses. User IDs could contain a hash of the email address. Applications querying the keyservers could query for the hashed email address. Privacy would be the main advantage to such a system; eliminating the possibility of keyserver spam is a positive side-effect. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Can you imagine a world with no hypothetical situations? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBTBJjEaipC46tDG5pAQqa8AQAk1AYt5BJlQ+WJFTz2aysR8SK6DbD0jjR HkQVxuogazcvNFpeb/I8NH4HmC8LS6U+FTGEK2zc9e+lfwYaUiEwUaBlGj5rI9mN jnW3Txo01I161mM0jQVKyLG3YFhv+GIUNCPFyhLyd8wO7rt6fUnDzX65Qjv06BS9 Cyz7lT37eOM= =fJHN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users