-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Friday 6 May 2011 at 8:48:03 PM, in <mid:201105062148.04...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de>, Ingo Klöcker wrote: > Unless I'm missing something the difference is as > follows: - With prolongation of the expiration time > releases signed before the prolongation will keep > having a valid signature. - If one creates a new subkey > then releases signed with the old expired subkey(s) > will have an invalid signature. One would have to > re-sign the old releases with the new subkey. Surely the signature on the old release would still be valid; it would just be from a now-expired subkey instead of from the new and currently-valid subkey. Or have I overlooked something? - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Of course it's a good idea - it's mine! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE7BAEBCgClBQJNxGIFnhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pSkUD/3SU IPu98qzm8wAsXVjnvwkn8rZD8x3Q5V9Xre3+uV5k2G6VEwDV75NXkG65pE4Ol/+c 4Ex7+qny7QhK+8xL2xyTsZGSVGZyYgsjkKlRTw2ocD64leu15Q9+RQxdR2ummqA5 9Z8XT3CWnkjGLHIKNNgey2xX8ZsHHIOKCXqdpfXM =A0bx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users