On 01/05/2018 01:46 AM, Lou Wynn wrote: > On 01/04/2018 04:15 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 01/05/2018 01:12 AM, Lou Wynn wrote: >>> I guess that you've missed somewhere I said in my previous posts that >>> the end user chooses his own password to protect his key password, which >>> is meant to prevent others from using his private keys. >> At which point I'm wondering about your priorities, if the corporation >> doesn't have access to the data (without the specific encryption key >> being included) what is the value? > Sorry, I don't get it. Can you explain your question again? What data, > in which scenario? >
Businesses have reasonable need to access their data, so they need to have access to his private keys, which contradicts "which is meant to prevent others from using his private keys", although reading it again I presume you're limiting the statement to non-authorized personnel in the normal scenario? -- ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 ---------------------------- "In politics stupidity is not a handicap." (Napoleon Bonaparte)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users