On 02/22/2018 11:13 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 02/22/2018 11:03 PM, Henry wrote: >> 2018-02-21 20:56 GMT+09:00 Kristian Fiskerstrand >> <kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com>: >>> On 02/21/2018 11:53 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote: >>> Touché :) Indeed, didn't notice it was an old file/signature , then >>> gnupg 1.4 is the recommended official suggestion presuming established >>> validity of key material etc etc. >> gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.22 does give more information, but no success; see >> below. May I assume that nothing >> can be done other than to request the author to remedy the situation? >> Thanks all. >> > --allow-weak-digest-algos > Signatures made with known-weak digest algorithms are normally > allows the verification of signatures made with such weak algorithms. > MD5 is the only digest algorithm considered weak by default. >
That was truncated; .B --allow-weak-digest-algos Signatures made with known-weak digest algorithms are normally rejected with an ``invalid digest algorithm'' message. This option allows the verification of signatures made with such weak algorithms. MD5 is the only digest algorithm considered weak by default. See also \fB--weak-digest\fR to reject other digest algorithms. -- ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 ---------------------------- Varitatio delectat Change pleases
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users