On 05/19/2018 11:44 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi Robert. > > On 20/05/2018 02:26, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> Writing just for myself -- not for GnuPG and not for Enigmail and >> definitely not for my employer -- I put together a postmortem on Efail. >> You may find it worth reading. You may also not. Your mileage will >> probably vary. :) >> >> https://medium.com/@cipherpunk/efail-a-postmortem-4bef2cea4c08 > > As a long time reader and partly gpg user I would like to thank you for > the post. > >>From my point of view must be something more behind the curtain. > > I do not want to create a conspiracy theory but it's wiggy that > EFF favors *NO* security ,pgp or s/mime, instead to fix the current > possibilities and promote signal.
I read the EFF warning as a temporary measure, to prevent adversaries from sending cyphertext, and getting plaintext back. Until these exploits were blocked. And if necessary, to use Signal in the interim. <SNIP> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users