Hi. Am Montag, den 30.07.2018, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Felix E. Klee: > Zum Vergleich eine Datei, die ich selbst für mich verschlüsselt habe, > und die ich erfolgreich entschlüsseln kann: > > >gpg --list-packets foo.gpg > gpg: encrypted with 4096-bit RSA key, ID 04FDF78D1679DD94, > created 2 > 016-12-17 > "Felix E. Klee <felix.k...@inka.de>" > # off=0 ctb=85 tag=1 hlen=3 plen=524 > :pubkey enc packet: version 3, algo 1, keyid 04FDF78D1679DD94 > data: [4094 bits] > # off=527 ctb=d2 tag=18 hlen=2 plen=76 new-ctb > :encrypted data packet: > length: 76 > mdc_method: 2 > # off=548 ctb=a3 tag=8 hlen=1 plen=0 indeterminate > :compressed packet: algo=2 > # off=550 ctb=cb tag=11 hlen=2 plen=23 new-ctb > :literal data packet: > mode b (62), created 1532945681, name="", > raw data: 17 bytes
As a dirty workaroung you could generate a dedicated key without subkeys with the capabilities set to [SCE] and try this key, which should work. This will not fix the Issue per se, but should get your decryption working while you try to solve the main problem. I don't npw how important the data exchange in your case is. Regards, Dirk -- Dirk Gottschalk Paulusstrasse 6-8 52064 Aachen, Germany GPG: DDCB AF8E 0132 AA54 20AB B864 4081 0B18 1ED8 E838 Keybase.io: https://keybase.io/dgottschalk GitHub: https://github.com/Dirk1980ac id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker">
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users