On Sun, 09 Dec 2018 20:55:36 +0100, Dirk Gottschalk wrote: Hello Dirk,
> That I mentioned in the other reply I have sent a few seconds ago. > > > right? A key which would bear a CA sig would imho not have such > > additional and funny UID's or sigs, because it would make the key > > owner look a bit stupid, i would say. > > No. The signatures on a key are nor related to each other. A funni > signature could be backdated before the signature by the CA were made. > Who's the stupid now, in the eyes of the user seeing this? ^^ Do you really think a user with a CA sig would do that, with my proposals i have made? Regards Stefan -- https://www.behance.net/futagoza https://keybase.io/stefan_claas
pgpkpHR6TFiSG.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users