Hi @ll. Am Freitag, den 14.06.2019, 10:12 +0200 schrieb Oscar Carlsson via Gnupg-users: > Hi,
> I'm generally curious on your opinions on the latest new keyserver, > this > time running a new software than the normal keyservers. > They seem to have a different model which minimize the amount of > information available, to be compliant with GDPR and friends. Do you > think there are any downsides to this? Unfortunately I promised to Werner to not get political anymore about the EU and GDPR thingies. To the Server you're Mentioning: I don't think it's such a good idea to drop Signatures on keys. Validating the KEys and it's packet would mitigate many of the SKS issues. But some people and solutions rely on the signatures. Okay, running an in house keyserver might be an option for this situations. Also the centralized Approach is a no go in my opinion. Reading this thread, I feel like I've done a time travel, back to the times where people distributed their keys over the usenet due to the lack of keyserver dunctionality. Keyservers like the desribed one is less than useless in my opinion. Even removing the ability to search for keys by UID is a thing I don't like. But that's the GDPR panic. Yes, I know, no politics from the angry guy. ^^ So, it's pretty hot here. Werner must have turned on the Heater. I'll be quite now. :D Regards, Dirk -- Dirk Gottschalk GPG: 4278 1FCA 035A 9A63 4166 CE11 7544 0AD9 4996 F380 Keybase: https://keybase.io/dgottschalk GitHub: https://github.com/Dirk1980ac
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
