Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > raf via Gnupg-users wrote: > > > Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > > > > > Andrew Gallagher wrote: > > > > > > > * And finally: “don’t encrypt email”? Yes, well. Email is not going > > > > away. Just like passwords, its death has been long anticipated, yet > > > > never arrives. So what do we do in the meantime? > > > > > > I think the biggest problems is how can PGP or GnuPG users tell other > > > users, not familar with email encyrption yet, what else to use ... > > > > At work, when a client insists on email, and I (or the law) > > insist on encryption, I provide them with instructions for > > installing 7-zip and send them an AES-256 encrypted zip or 7z > > file as an attachment. It's the simplest thing I could think > > of that I thought most people could cope with. > > That is simple, indeed. But how do you exchange passphrases for > the encrypted files in advance and do you switch them regularly > or leave them the same when dealing with many clients? > > I solved this with using NaCl public keys, bearing no infos of > the key owners and having a little key ring, where I only assign > nicknames to the pub keys. The software I use is box > > https://github.com/rovaughn/box
Windows users who are interested to try out box can find a GUI based solution, from inwtx, at github. https://github.com/inwtx/NaClBoxEncryption https://github.com/inwtx/NaClBoxEncryption/releases It uses base64 as armor and the armor headers can be set to 'off'. Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users