I do not want to use Gmail to send that kind of informations and I'm
comtemplating using posteo.de.

Is this any better?

I'd argue of course it's better. Google openly admits reading your e-mail, so other mail providers that respect your privacy should be preferred. I particularly like posteo.de, because the 1€/month fee is still very cheap but makes clear that they have a different business model that doesn't involve customer data. Furthermore, they deploy a very sophisticated solution that makes it technically impossible to match payment data or IP addresses to mailboxes, and even fought (and won!) a lawsuit against the German authorities that wanted to force posteo to hand out customer data (which they don't even collect).

However, while this will surely be an improvement over providers like Google, it doesn't solve the encryption problem. While providers like posteo make it easy for laypeople to use encryption, for example by providing good instructions and supporting gpg encryption in their webclient, you'd probably still need to help a layperson in setting up their gpg keys, either in thunderbird or in the webclient of a provider supporting this. So if the person is willing to try encryption, you're probably best off by helping them doing it before sending your personal information.

Hope that helps a bit,

lukaro


_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to