Mail-Archive switched to a policy of completely removing email addresses quite some time ago - it was a reluctant move, but the user requests were overwhelming. Older messages were not updated, and still have lightly obfuscated addresses or unobfuscated addresses in message bodies.
I will go ahead and manually censor the struts-user message cited, remind me if you don't see a change within a week. I will not make a completely anonymous archive (for example, the POST protected reply mechanism stays). Mail-Archive fights spammers in a dozen different ways, which gets tiring after a while. But there will always be some risk and don't confuse these efforts with any sort of guarantee. >I'm convinced that if I eliminate most traces of my mail address on >the web, I'll not receive more junk mail than I receive now or best >I'll receive less. As someone who is perhaps slightly further ahead on the spam curve than most, I unfortunately doubt it. Spam in general is increasing wildly, and spammers are growing in number. My prediction is email will be completely unusable for everyone within two years without filters, and filter-resistant spam will continue rising to very annoying levels. It is very depresssing. -Jeff _______________________________________________ Gossip mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
