>If there are any spare cycles, they could be working on a new index. There is no spare disk I/O. If the archiving latency ever got to zero, we would have idle disk I/O. That hasn't happened in recent memory.
>So, in short there is no time/date attribute to sort the messages in >chronological order with the current htdig index? File timestamps have the information with a granularity of hours or a few days (as discussed earlier). I do not think filename (and therefore URL) will give any better granularity. I haven't touched htdig configuration in years, so I don't know if htdig has access to any of this information. -Jeff _______________________________________________ Gossip mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gossip
