On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 08:10:50AM -0700, Matt Wette wrote: > > > On 3/8/20 3:14 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I'm playing around with Nyacc [...]
> >So I defined some function =collect= which will be called from > >actions in the grammar. > > > >My question is: where is the stuff resolved which is mentioned > >in grammar actions? [...] Thanks for your quick response, and for taking the time to make sense of my diffuse text. > Nyacc was envisioned with the paradigm you propose, by using tags. > But I have not tried that in a while. If you look at the example calc > in examples/nyacc/lang/calc/mach.scm you will see Note that I'm not yet proposing a paradigm. What you (graciously) raise to the level of "paradigm" is still just a set of prejudices as I try to find a way through the bushes :) I'm ready & willing to change my way of seeing things. Care to explain why you havent tried your first paradigm in a while? After all you're probably the one having the most practical experience with Nyacc. > (define (gen-calc-files) [...] > You can run this, then you can use the generated files to provide > the parser [...] > (define calc-full-act-v [...] Thanks for the hint. I'll definitely give that angle a try. Cheers -- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
