Hiya,
On 08/06/2021 10:29, Ray Hunter (v6ops) wrote:
Just trying to understand this hurdle/ line of reasoning.So in addition to achieving "rough consensus", the IETF standardization process must also produce drafts that are very likely to gain traction to displace non-IETF non-standardised products that are already widely commercially deployed?
No. This is not a process hurdle. It was one amongst a bunch of personal comments I sent. And that I'm happy to discuss with the authors without wearing any chair or other hat. The process problem with these drafts is the lack of review means there's no way to claim they represent any useful level of WG consensus. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
