Reviewer: R. Gieben
Review result: Ready with Nits

A straight forward document specifying dhcpv6 options, had little trouble
reading it. Got a bit lost with acronyms though, i.e. forgetting what ORO is
when nearing the end of the document.

Any reason why DNS over HTTP (DoH, RFC 8484) isn't standardized in the same
document?

A Nit (maybe): in section 4.2: "... defined by standard." -> "... defined by
standard action" ?


_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to