Hi Lars, I am just doing a follow-up regarding the comment "This simply isn't implementable as described.". We would like to know if the current version is addressing that comment or if there is anything else that we need to clarify. Note that the document has undergone quite a lot of clarifications, and we expect to publish a new version as soon as the datatracker re-open. It's probably worth waiting for that new version (unless you read the one from github).
Yours, Daniel On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:22 AM Daniel Migault <mglt.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Lars, > > I have removed the section related to dynamic update which is a non > technical section that everyone discusses. Such discussions had been > endless and unhelpful in the homenet wg. We thought this section would > close some of these discussions, but it seems it reopens others. We do not > want to discuss speculation regarding one or the other protocol. > > We are happy to understand why you think the protocol cannot be > implemented, but currently we do not see anything that supports this. > > Yours, > Daniel > > > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:10 AM Lars Eggert via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation-19: Abstain >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-front-end-naming-delegation/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I agree with the Discusses and Comments on this document - this simply >> isn't >> implementable as described. >> >> My main reason for abstaining is something else though. This document has >> been >> worked on for almost ten years. While in the beginning, we might have >> expected >> or at least hoped that a solution in the shape that this document tries to >> describe would see adoption, it's become very clear that dynamic DNS >> services >> as described in Section 4 have won out here. These services are far from >> perfect, but at least some of the limitations in Section 4 have been >> addressed, >> and others are arguably a feature and not a limitation. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> homenet mailing list >> homenet@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet >> > > > -- > Daniel Migault > Ericsson > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
