[x] migrate to java.util.logging With solutions like JULI [1] and jul-Log4j-bridge [2] I see no reason of what so ever for both commons logging and slf4j to exist
Oleg [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/logging.html [2] http://people.apache.org/~psmith/logging.apache.org/sandbox/jul-log4j-bridge/ PS: I'll tally the votes on Friday On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 22:36 +0200, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > Folks, > > We are currently considering whether we should continue using > commons-logging or migrate to SLF4J or java.util.logging. Please let us > what your preference is. We are going to make the final decision based > on the results of the poll. A simple majority will _not_ automatically > impose a particular choice but will strongly influence the decision > making process. > > All users of HttpClient are encouraged to participate. > > Oleg > > ------------------- > [ ] keep Commons logging > [ ] migrate to SLF4J > [ ] migrate to java.util.logging > ------------------- > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
