Dan:
In reading the log I used the .smp number to determine the process.. guess
that is what is also throwing me
See my additional post to Len's reply.
Could it be due to the fact that he is using his Netscape address book for
his mailing list?
The email itself is about 2k in length, btw.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Donnelly
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 3:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] delays
Michael,
The delivery may have been partially completed in the orginal thread (the ID
number in '()'). Your log shows 2 different process numbers, so the earlier
one must have finished and also show a 'finished' line. If the message has
an
address of a host without a backup and was down for 2.5 hrs, this could be
perfectly normal! Look more carefully and you will see each delivery attempt
of that Q file to get the complete picture of what IMail is doing each
time.
Daniel Donnelly
Ipswitch Technical Support
________________________________________________________
See our Knowledge Base at http://support.ipswitch.com/kb
In reply to 13 Oct message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>Sorry about the html before. Hope this is fixed this time
>Here is the mail delay I found in the log. Any suggestions as to why
it
>takes so long?
>10:12 07:26 SMTP-(0000015C) processing C:\IMAIL\spool\Q1af22ec.SMD
10:12
>10:08 SMTP-(0000005A) finished C:\IMAIL\spool\Q1af22ec.SMP status=3
>2 hrs 42 mins!!!
>Weird
>Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be
>removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
