Remember SBC and ATT have joined forces!  I am not sure who brought who.

Greg Shepherd


-----Original Message-----
From:   Travis Rabe [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:54 AM
To:     Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject:        Re: [IMail Forum] worldnet

 << File: ATT00014.html >> They must be doing some major changes over there.  
Their DNS query for MX
records has changed today.  Now it returns info differently.....very odd.
Maybe they are combining stuff with SBC??

; <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> @192.168.10.5 worldnet.att.net mx
; (1 server found)
;; global options:  printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 1236
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 6

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;worldnet.att.net.              IN      MX

;; ANSWER SECTION:
worldnet.att.net.       21521   IN      MX      5 gateway2.worldnet.att.net.
worldnet.att.net.       21521   IN      MX      5 gateway1.worldnet.att.net.

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
worldnet.att.net.       21521   IN      NS      ds3.worldnet.att.net.
worldnet.att.net.       21521   IN      NS      ds4.worldnet.att.net.
worldnet.att.net.       21521   IN      NS      ds1.worldnet.att.net.
worldnet.att.net.       21521   IN      NS      ds2.worldnet.att.net.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
gateway1.worldnet.att.net. 21521 IN     A       204.127.134.23
gateway2.worldnet.att.net. 21521 IN     A       12.102.240.23
ds1.worldnet.att.net.   172721  IN      A       204.127.129.11
ds2.worldnet.att.net.   172721  IN      A       12.102.240.11
ds3.worldnet.att.net.   172721  IN      A       204.127.160.11
ds4.worldnet.att.net.   172721  IN      A       12.102.244.11

;; Query time: 0 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.10.5#53(192.168.10.5)
;; WHEN: Wed Jul 12 07:51:29 2006
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 252









On 7/12/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have the same issue with ATT and our forward and reverse are
> both correct.
>
>
> Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 3:02:18 PM, Sandeep Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> ATT WorldNet guys do the reverse PTR check and that may be  the
> SA> issue. Search on Google for Reverse PTR entry for more details and
> SA> get this  inserted in your DNS records. It probably will resolve
> the  issue.
> SA>
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> --Sandeep
> SA>
> SA>
>
> SA>
> SA>
>
> SA>  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SA> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matrosity  Hosting
> SA> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:05 PM
> SA> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> SA> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum]  worldnet
>
> SA>
> SA> I'm wondering if it's actually trying for that long a  period. I
> SA> believe the customer states they come back within an  hour.
>
> SA> Travis Rabe wrote:
> SA> So it tried 5 times X 30 minutes between each send    attempt.
>
>
> SA> 2.5 hours - right? Ride it    out..............
>
>
> SA> Travis
>
>
>
> SA>
> SA> On 7/11/06, Matrosity    Hosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    wrote:
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> retry timer: 30      minutes
> SA>
>
>
> SA> Travis Rabe wrote:
> SA> And what are you intervals set at?
>
> SA> T
>
> SA>
> SA> On 7/11/06, Matrosity Hosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> Tries Before Return to Sender:          5
> SA>
>
>
> SA> Travis Rabe wrote:
> SA> Perahps the Gmail mail does not go through. Their
> SA> retry time is very long. I usually dont get bounces for at least
> SA> a half day. How many times does Imail try before it gives         up?
>
> SA> T
>
> SA>
> SA> On 7/11/06, Matrosity Hosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> I agree with you              but am just trying to explain this
> SA> to someone that has success using              a free service and
> failure using ours.
> SA>
>
>
> SA> Travis Rabe wrote:
> SA> I give up...............last                time...........
>
>
>
> SA> Your are having                troubles...........
>
> SA> I show I can email them either - about                1 in 100 get
> through...................
>
> SA> www.dnsreport.com shows they are
> having                troubles..............
>
> SA> I don't know what else to tell you                except to call
> SA> worldnet. I tried to get you some info there                but
> SA> www.worldnet.att.net web page comes back with a
> SA> error and timed out! But I am sure those people at Google         get
> the page right away.........
>
>
>
>
> SA>
> SA> On 7/11/06, Matrosity Hosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> here's a                  quote:
>
> SA>
> SA> I think                  you have to ask the question - "Why can
> SA> I send an email from my                  gmail account and one
> SA> from my own mail server account at exactly                  the
> SA> same time and the gmail email goes through (every time) and
> SA> my server mail is rejected (every  time)?"
> SA>
>
> SA> Travis Rabe wrote:
> SA> It will be a hit and miss with a 450                    error.
>
>
> SA> DNSReport shows problems on their end as                    well
>
>
> SA> Travis
>
> SA>
> SA> On 7/11/06, Matrosity Hosting < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> well,                      they can send from their Gmail account
> SA> so it's tough to                      argue.
> SA>
>
>
> SA> Travis Rabe wrote:
> SA> Since those are the only two MX record listed
> SA> and both return the same erorr code (450 means they are
> SA> overwhelmed or have internal problems), there isn't much           you
> can do except wait.
>
>
> SA> Telneting to port 25 on                        each server from
> SA> here, resulted in the same type of                        problem -
> bot just you.
>
> SA> Travis
>
>
> SA> ;                        <<>> DiG 9.3.2 <<>> @192.168.10.5
> worldnet.att.net mx
> SA> ; (1 server                        found)
> SA> ;; global options: printcmd
> SA> ;; Got                        answer:
> ;; ->>>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY,                        status: NOERROR,
> id: 1202
> SA> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1,                        ANSWER: 2,
> AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 2
>
> SA> ;; QUESTION                        SECTION:
> SA> ;worldnet.att.net.                        IN MX
>
> SA> ;; ANSWER                        SECTION:
> SA> worldnet.att.net.                        21600 IN
> SA> MX 5 gateway1.worldnet.att.net.
> SA> worldnet.att.net.                        21600 IN
> SA> MX 5 gateway2.worldnet.att.net.
>
> SA> ;;                        AUTHORITY SECTION:
> SA> worldnet.att.net.                        172800 IN    NS
> ds1.worldnet.att.net.
> SA> worldnet.att.net.                        172800 IN    NS
> ds2.worldnet.att.net.
> SA> worldnet.att.net.                        172800 IN    NS
> ds3.worldnet.att.net.
> SA> worldnet.att.net.                        172800 IN    NS
> ds4.worldnet.att.net.
>
> SA> ;;                        ADDITIONAL SECTION:
> SA> gateway1.worldnet.att.net. 21600                        IN    A
> 204.127.134.23
> SA> gateway2.worldnet.att.net. 21600                        IN    A
> 12.102.240.23
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SA>
> SA> On 7/11/06, Matrosity Hosting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SA>
> SA>
> SA> We                          can't seem to be able to deliver
> SA> email to worldnet.att.net and I can't
> SA> understand why. Our logs show that their server is too
> SA> busy to accept but it seems to always say this and we've
> SA> got customers complainging. Is there anything we can               do?
>
> SA> 07:11 03:14 SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896)
> SA> processing c:\IMail\spool\Q3b0b0a5100007896.SMD
> SA> 07:11                          03:14 SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896) Trying
> worldnet.att.net (0)
> SA> 07:11 03:14                          SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896) 450
> SA> busy - please try                          later
> SA> 07:11 03:14 SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896) Connection
> SA> returned error - skipping 204.127.134.23 450 busy - please try
> later
> SA> 07:11 03:14 SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896) 450 busy
> -                    please try later
> SA> 07:11 03:14 SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896)
> SA> Connection returned error - skipping 12.102.240.23 450 busy -
> SA> please try                          later
> SA> 07:11 03:14 SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896) requeuing
> SA> c:\IMail\spool\Q3b0b0a5100007896.SMD R0 T4
> SA> 07:11                          03:14 SMTP-(3b0b0a5100007896)
> SA> finished
> SA> c:\IMail\spool\Q3b0b0a5100007896.SMD                          status=3
>
>
>
>
>
>
> SA> --
> SA> Regards,
> SA> Travis Rabe
> SA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> SA> --
> SA> Regards,
> SA> Travis Rabe
> SA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> SA> --
> SA> Regards,
> SA> Travis Rabe
> SA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> SA> --
> SA> Regards,
> SA> Travis Rabe
> SA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> SA> --
> SA> Regards,
> SA> Travis Rabe
> SA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.inetconcepts.net
> (972) 788-2364                    Fax: (972) 788-5049
> ----
>
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
>



-- 
Regards,
Travis Rabe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


****************************************************************************
 The contents of this email and any attachments may be privileged,
 Confidential, and protected from disclosure.
 It is intended only for the use of the individual to whom it
 is addressed.  Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication
 is strictly prohibited.
 If you received this communication in error, please notify us
 immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

 Additional assistance can be obtained by emailing 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thank you.
****************************************************************************
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to