> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Hilber <peter.hil...@opensynergy.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 5:15 PM > To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjany...@intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: t...@linutronix.de; jstu...@google.com; giome...@enneenne.com; > cor...@lwn.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org; > net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired- > l...@lists.osuosl.org; Dong, Eddie <eddie.d...@intel.com>; Hall, Christopher S > <christopher.s.h...@intel.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse > <jesse.brandeb...@intel.com>; da...@davemloft.net; > alexandre.tor...@foss.st.com; joab...@synopsys.com; > mcoquelin.st...@gmail.com; pe...@perex.cz; linux-so...@vger.kernel.org; > Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.ngu...@intel.com>; N, Pandith > <pandit...@intel.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa > <mallikarjunappa.sanganna...@intel.com>; T R, Thejesh Reddy > <thejesh.reddy....@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator > > On 09.01.24 07:31, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> > >> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 8:50 PM > >> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjany...@intel.com> > >> Cc: t...@linutronix.de; jstu...@google.com; giome...@enneenne.com; > >> cor...@lwn.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org; > >> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired- > >> l...@lists.osuosl.org; Dong, Eddie <eddie.d...@intel.com>; Hall, > >> Christopher S <christopher.s.h...@intel.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse > >> <jesse.brandeb...@intel.com>; da...@davemloft.net; > >> alexandre.tor...@foss.st.com; joab...@synopsys.com; > >> mcoquelin.st...@gmail.com; pe...@perex.cz; > >> linux-so...@vger.kernel.org; Nguyen, Anthony L > >> <anthony.l.ngu...@intel.com>; N, Pandith <pandit...@intel.com>; > >> Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa <mallikarjunappa.sanganna...@intel.com>; > >> T R, Thejesh Reddy <thejesh.reddy....@intel.com> > >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator > >> > [...] > >> At some point you should announce v1 of the series. RFC is usually > >> being neglected by many (busy) maintainers. > > > > This patch series is dependent on > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231215220612.173603-2- > peter.hil...@opensynergy.com/T/ which is RFC. > > So I understand my dependency series being RFC prevents the PPS series from > dropping the RFC tag (correct me if I am wrong). > > I plan to send out a non-RFC version of the dependency series next. So far I > think > there will only be polishing changes. Due to testing being some effort, I > wanted > to test and send it together with some other series. > > But if this is blocking the PPS series, I think I could send out a non-RFC > version of > the dependency series earlier (by the end of January?). Please let me know > what > would align with the PPS series timeline.
Thanks Peter, This timeline should be okay. We will also send non-RFC v1 by the same time. Regards, Sowjanya > Regards, > > Peter > > > > > Regards, > > Sowjanya > >> > >> -- > >> With Best Regards, > >> Andy Shevchenko > >> > >
