[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16167242#comment-16167242
 ] 

Dian Fu commented on FLINK-7606:
--------------------------------

I think this is by design otherwise users could not get the timed out partially 
matched sequences as they will be cleared by the timers. For the memory leak 
issue, it seems that you are using the {{MemoryStateBackend}}, is it just used 
for test or will also used in your product environment? I think with 
{{RocksDBStateBackend}}, there will be no memory leak issue. 

> CEP operator leaks state
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7606
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CEP
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.1
>            Reporter: Matteo Ferrario
>         Attachments: heap-dump1.png, heap-dump2.png, heap-dump3.png
>
>
> The NestedMapsStateTable grows up continuously without free the heap memory.
> We created a simple job that processes a stream of messages and uses CEP to 
> generate an outcome message when a specific pattern is identified.
> The messages coming from the stream are grouped by a key defined in a 
> specific field of the message.
> We've also added the "within" clause (set as 5 minutes), indicating that two 
> incoming messages match the pattern only if they come in a certain time 
> window.
> What we've seen is that for every key present in the message, an NFA object 
> is instantiated in the NestedMapsStateTable and it is never deallocated.
> Also the "within" clause didn't help: we've seen that if we send messages 
> that don't match the pattern, the memory grows up (I suppose that the state 
> of NFA is updated) but it is not cleaned also after the 5 minutes of time 
> window defined in "within" clause.
> If you need, I can provide more details about the job we've implemented and 
> also the screenshots about the memory leak.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to