jiangzho opened a new pull request, #817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/817

   <!--
   *Thank you very much for contributing to the Apache Flink Kubernetes 
Operator - we are happy that you want to help us improve the project. To help 
the community review your contribution in the best possible way, please go 
through the checklist below, which will get the contribution into a shape in 
which it can be best reviewed.*
   
   ## Contribution Checklist
   
     - Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [JIRA 
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/issues). Exceptions are 
made for typos in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no JIRA issue.
     
     - Name the pull request in the form "[FLINK-XXXX] [component] Title of the 
pull request", where *FLINK-XXXX* should be replaced by the actual issue 
number. Skip *component* if you are unsure about which is the best component.
     Typo fixes that have no associated JIRA issue should be named following 
this pattern: `[hotfix][docs] Fix typo in event time introduction` or 
`[hotfix][javadocs] Expand JavaDoc for PuncuatedWatermarkGenerator`.
   
     - Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the 
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
     
     - Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean 
verify` passes. You can read more on how we use GitHub Actions for CI 
[here](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/development/guide/#cicd).
   
     - Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from 
multiple issues.
     
     - Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message 
(including the JIRA id)
   
     - Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and 
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
   
   
   **(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes of typos)**
   -->
   
   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   This patch is to tackle the corner case where `cleanup` of CustomResource is 
constantly failing due to event publish failure, and therefore cause the 
`cleanup` hanging forever.
   
   Operator attempts to publish events when reconcile changes or cleaning up 
for a CustomResource. This patch allows the reconcile & clean up logic to 
proceed, if and only if the event publishing fails as a result of 403 
forbidden, which happens when the namespace is being deleted (in terminating 
state). k8s rejects events / resource creation in a terminating namespace.
   
   In this way, at-least-once events delivery is still guaranteed in other 
cases. Event consumers need to account for the "namespace deleted" scenario, 
which all resources within are implicitly deleted.
   
   ## Brief change log
   
     - Fix event publish blocking reconcile & cleanup upon 403
   
   ## Verifying this change
   <!--
   Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follows the 
conventions defined in our code quality guide: 
https://flink.apache.org/contributing/code-style-and-quality-common.html#testing
   -->
   
   This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
   
     - Added additional scenario in EventUtilsTest and expect it to succeed
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changes to the `CustomResourceDescriptors`: 
no
     - Core observer or reconciler logic that is regularly executed: yes
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to