[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viraj Jasani updated HBASE-24757:
---------------------------------
Summary: ReplicationSink should limit the batch rowcount for batch
mutations based on hbase.rpc.rows.warning.threshold (was: ReplicationSink
should limit the batch size for batch mutations based on
hbase.rpc.rows.warning.threshold)
> ReplicationSink should limit the batch rowcount for batch mutations based on
> hbase.rpc.rows.warning.threshold
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-24757
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24757
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Viraj Jasani
> Assignee: Viraj Jasani
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 2.3.1, 1.7.0, 2.4.0, 2.2.7
>
>
> At times there are quite a large no of WAL Edits to ship as part of
> Replication and sometimes replication queues accumulate huge list of Edits to
> process. ReplicationSink at the sink server usually goes through all Edits
> and creates map of table -> list of rows grouped by clusterIds, and performs
> batch mutation of all rows per table level. However, there is no limit to no
> of Rows that are sent as part of batch mutate call. If no of rows > limit
> threshold defined by hbase.rpc.rows.warning.threshold, we usually get warn
> "Large batch operation detected". If hbase.rpc.rows.size.threshold.reject is
> turned on, RS will reject the whole batch without processing.
> We should let Replication Sink honour this threshold value and accordingly
> keep the size lower per batch mutation call.
> Replication triggered batch mutations should always be consumed but keeping
> limit of mutation low enough will let the system function at the same pace
> and without triggering redundant warnings. This will also restrict
> exploitation of cpu cycles at the destination server.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
