[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15581361#comment-15581361
 ] 

Debasish Das commented on SPARK-5992:
-------------------------------------

Did you compare with brute force knn ? Normally lsh does not work well for nn 
queries and that's why hybrid spill trees and other ideas came along....I can 
run some comparisons using SPARK-4823

> Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) for MLlib
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-5992
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5992
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: MLlib
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) would be very useful for ML.  It would be 
> great to discuss some possible algorithms here, choose an API, and make a PR 
> for an initial algorithm.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to