[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17503212#comment-17503212
 ] 

Thomas Graves edited comment on SPARK-36645 at 3/8/22, 10:52 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Note it appears this only really pushes down count and min and max for some 
types because:

Parquet Binary min/max could be truncated. We may get wrong result if we rely 
on parquet Binary min/max.

I'm going to update the title to reflect this.


was (Author: tgraves):
Note it appears this only really pushes down count because:

Parquet Binary min/max could be truncated. We may get wrong result if we rely 
on parquet Binary min/max.

I'm going to update the title to reflect this.

> Aggregate (Min/Max/Count) push down for Parquet
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-36645
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36645
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Huaxin Gao
>            Assignee: Huaxin Gao
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.3.0
>
>
> Push down Aggregate (Min/Max/Count)  for Parquet for performance improvement



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to