[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17538086#comment-17538086
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-32268:
--------------------------------------
User 'HyukjinKwon' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/36576
> Bloom Filter Join
> -----------------
>
> Key: SPARK-32268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32268
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: Yuming Wang
> Assignee: Yingyi Bu
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: q16-bloom-filter.jpg, q16-default.jpg
>
>
> We can improve the performance of some joins by pre-filtering one side of a
> join using a Bloom filter and IN predicate generated from the values from the
> other side of the join.
> For
> example:[tpcds/q16.sql|https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/a78d6ce376edf2a8836e01f47b9dff5371058d4c/sql/core/src/test/resources/tpcds/q16.sql].
> [Before this
> optimization|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13007418/q16-default.jpg].
> [After this
> optimization|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13007416/q16-bloom-filter.jpg].
> *Query Performance Benchmarks: TPC-DS Performance Evaluation*
> Our setup for running TPC-DS benchmark was as follows: TPC-DS 5T and
> Partitioned Parquet table
>
> |Query|Default(Seconds)|Enable Bloom Filter Join(Seconds)|
> |tpcds q16|84|46|
> |tpcds q36|29|21|
> |tpcds q57|39|28|
> |tpcds q94|42|34|
> |tpcds q95|306|288|
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
