[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14390350#comment-14390350
 ] 

Sean Owen commented on SPARK-6630:
----------------------------------

This should be as simple as {{  def setIfMissing(key: String, value: => 
String): SparkConf = ... }} if I'm not mistaken about how this works in Scala? 
Would you like to make a PR and verify it lazily evaluates? I can't think of a 
scenario where it would be important to always evaluate the argument.

> SparkConf.setIfMissing should only evaluate the assigned value if indeed 
> missing
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-6630
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6630
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Spark Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Svend Vanderveken
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The method setIfMissing() in SparkConf is currently systematically evaluating 
> the right hand side of the assignment even if not used. This leads to 
> unnecessary computation, like in the case of 
> {code}
>   conf.setIfMissing("spark.driver.host", Utils.localHostName())
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to