[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15140434#comment-15140434
 ] 

Tsai Li Ming commented on SPARK-3220:
-------------------------------------

[~derrickburns], Is your private fork at 
https://github.com/derrickburns/generalized-kmeans-clustering ?

I am having the same problem here:
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Re-Kmeans-using-1-core-only-Was-Slowness-in-Kmeans-calculating-fastSquaredDistance-td16304.html



> K-Means clusterer should perform K-Means initialization in parallel
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-3220
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3220
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: MLlib
>            Reporter: Derrick Burns
>              Labels: clustering
>
> The LocalKMeans method should be replaced with a parallel implementation.  As 
> it stands now, it becomes a bottleneck for large data sets. 
> I have implemented this functionality in my version of the clusterer.  
> However, I see that there are hundreds of outstanding pull requests.  If 
> someone on the team wants to sponsor the pull request, I will create one.  
> Otherwise, I will just maintain my own private fork of the clusterer.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to