[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sameer Agarwal updated SPARK-13668:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
If a filter predicate or a join condition consists of `IsNotNull` checks, we 
should reorder these checks such that these non-nullability checks are 
evaluated before the rest of the predicates.

For e.g., if a filter predicate is of the form `a > 5 && isNotNull(b)`, we 
should rewrite this as `isNotNull(b) && a > 5` during physical plan generation.

cc [~nongli] [~yhuai]

  was:
If a filter predicate or a join condition consists of `IsNotNull` checks, we 
should reorder these checks such that these non-nullability checks are 
evaluated before the rest of the predicates.

For e.g., if a filter predicate is of the form `a > 5 && isNotNull(b)`, we 
should rewrite this as `isNotNull(b) && a` during physical plan generation.

cc [~nongli] [~yhuai]


> Reorder filter/join predicates to short-circuit isNotNull checks
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-13668
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13668
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sameer Agarwal
>
> If a filter predicate or a join condition consists of `IsNotNull` checks, we 
> should reorder these checks such that these non-nullability checks are 
> evaluated before the rest of the predicates.
> For e.g., if a filter predicate is of the form `a > 5 && isNotNull(b)`, we 
> should rewrite this as `isNotNull(b) && a > 5` during physical plan 
> generation.
> cc [~nongli] [~yhuai]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to