Saisai Shao created SPARK-13669:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Job will always fail in the external shuffle service 
unavailable situation
                 Key: SPARK-13669
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13669
             Project: Spark
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Spark Core, YARN
            Reporter: Saisai Shao


Currently we are running into an issue with Yarn work preserving enabled + 
external shuffle service. 

In the work preserving enabled scenario, the failure of NM will not lead to the 
exit of executors, so executors can still accept and run the tasks. The problem 
here is when NM is failed, external shuffle service is actually inaccessible, 
so reduce tasks will always complain about the “Fetch failure”, and the failure 
of reduce stage will make the parent stage (map stage) rerun. The tricky thing 
here is Spark scheduler is not aware of the unavailability of external shuffle 
service, and will reschedule the map tasks on the executor where NM is failed, 
and again reduce stage will be failed with “Fetch failure”, and after 4 
retries, the job is failed.

So here the actual problem is Spark’s scheduler is not aware of the 
unavailability of external shuffle service, and will still assign the tasks on 
to that nodes. The fix is to avoid assigning tasks on to that nodes.

Currently in the Spark, one related configuration is 
“spark.scheduler.executorTaskBlacklistTime”, but I don’t think it will be 
worked in this scenario. This configuration is used to avoid same reattempt 
task to run on the same executor. Also ways like MapReduce’s blacklist 
mechanism may not handle this scenario, since all the reduce tasks will be 
failed, so counting the failure tasks will equally mark all the executors as 
“bad” one.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to