lianetm commented on PR #15738:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/15738#issuecomment-2066577956

   Hey @lucasbru , answering your questions : the new behaviour of the static 
membership regarding a member that joins with dup group instance Id is 
documented in 
[this](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-848%3A+The+Next+Generation+of+the+Consumer+Rebalance+Protocol#KIP848:TheNextGenerationoftheConsumerRebalanceProtocol-StaticMembership(KIP-345))
 section of the KIP. We've also discussed it with @dajac and other client teams 
(librd), seeing the improvement the new protocol bring in this area (mainly in 
cases of conflicting members, that continuously kick each other out with the 
classic protocol)
      
   Your question does makes me notice that, even though the KIP describes how 
conflicting static members behave in the new protocol, it would probably be 
helpful extend that explanation to point out the fundamental difference it has 
with the legacy protocol and how it is an improved approach. (I can't find that 
explained in the KIP. If I'm not missing it, it would probably be a good update 
to the KIP [static membership 
section](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-848%3A+The+Next+Generation+of+the+Consumer+Rebalance+Protocol#KIP848:TheNextGenerationoftheConsumerRebalanceProtocol-StaticMembership(KIP-345))
 @dajac ?)
   
   Thanks @lucasbru ! 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to