[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17839441#comment-17839441
]
Matthias J. Sax commented on KAFKA-16514:
-----------------------------------------
You are right that there is alway a member-id etc – I am not sure though if
generating a random group.instance.id would be the right way forward.
Maybe making the Consumer#close() call flexible and allow uses to pass in a
CloseOption similar to what we do in KafkaStreams would be the cleaner
approach? An alternative might be (not sure what the exact scope would be) to
add a new AdminCiient method that allows to pass in a `member.id` to remove a
consumer from the group?
Another question is: is this "hack" we put into KS to not send a leave group
request still relevant? A lot of things got improved on the rebalance protocol
over the years, and it might not be necessary any longer?
Curious to hear what [~ableegoldman] and [~cadonna] think.
> Kafka Streams: stream.close(CloseOptions) does not respect options.leaveGroup
> flag.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-16514
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-16514
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: streams
> Affects Versions: 3.7.0
> Reporter: Sal Sorrentino
> Priority: Minor
>
> Working with Kafka Streams 3.7.0, but may affect earlier versions as well.
> When attempting to shutdown a streams application and leave the associated
> consumer group, the supplied `leaveGroup` option seems to have no effect.
> Sample code:
> {code:java}
> CloseOptions options = new CloseOptions().leaveGroup(true);
> stream.close(options);{code}
> The expected behavior here is that the group member would shutdown and leave
> the group, immediately triggering a consumer group rebalance. In practice,
> the rebalance happens after the appropriate timeout configuration has expired.
> I understand the default behavior in that there is an assumption that any
> associated StateStores would be persisted to disk and that in the case of a
> rolling restart/deployment, the rebalance delay may be preferable. However,
> in our application we are using in-memory state stores and standby replicas.
> There is no benefit in delaying the rebalance in this setup and we are in
> need of a way to force a member to leave the group when shutting down.
> The workaround we found is to set an undocumented internal StreamConfig to
> enforce this behavior:
> {code:java}
> props.put("internal.leave.group.on.close", true);
> {code}
> To state the obvious, this is less than ideal.
> Additional configuration details:
> {code:java}
> Properties props = new Properties();
> props.put(StreamsConfig.APPLICATION_ID_CONFIG, "someApplicationId");
> props.put(
> StreamsConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG,
> "localhost:9092,localhost:9093,localhost:9094");
> props.put(StreamsConfig.REPLICATION_FACTOR_CONFIG, 3);
> props.put(StreamsConfig.NUM_STANDBY_REPLICAS_CONFIG, 1);
> props.put(StreamsConfig.NUM_STREAM_THREADS_CONFIG, numProcessors);
> props.put(StreamsConfig.PROCESSING_GUARANTEE_CONFIG,
> StreamsConfig.EXACTLY_ONCE_V2);{code}
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
