On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdeping...@gmail.com> wrote: [..] > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsController::()::test_create_with_invalid_reviewer > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsController::()::test_update_with_invalid_reviewer > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsController::()::test_edit_with_invalid_reviewer > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsGetRepoRefs::test_repo_refs_empty_repo > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsGetRepoRefs::test_repo_refs_one_commit_no_hints > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsGetRepoRefs::test_repo_refs_one_commit_rev_hint > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsGetRepoRefs::test_repo_refs_two_commits_branch_hint > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsGetRepoRefs::test_repo_refs_two_commits_no_hints > FAIL > kallithea/tests/functional/test_pullrequests.py::TestPullrequestsGetRepoRefs::test_repo_refs_two_commits_rev_hints > > > Basically there are two types of failure: > > - first one where a 400 status code is expected but with some message > "Invalid reviewer specified", and the real response is 400 without > that message. At first sight it looks unrelated to the translation. > Perhaps this is a new difference between pylons and turbogears?
Did some investigation already: the message 'Invalid reviewer specified' is given in a flash message. It thus seems that the flash messages are not correctly handled in the test execution, or otherwise treated differently compared to before. I can try to investigate this further... /Thomas _______________________________________________ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general