https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457859
Jakob Petsovits <jpe...@petsovits.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #15 from Jakob Petsovits <jpe...@petsovits.com> ---
Oded, your Comment #2 included the command `systemd-inhibit
--what=idle:sleep:shutdown:handle-lid-switch --who=test --why=coz sleep 300`
which sets all the inhibitors at once. To me it's clear that the
"handle-lid-switch" inhibitor is insufficiently handled right now, and Bug
485623 (which you've now created to address that particular issue) is arguably
valid.
Natalie's comment was about the "sleep" and "idle" inhibitors, replying to the
question I raised independently of "handle-lid-switch" which I tried to analyze
first (up to Comment #10). There was some discussion on Matrix involving a
number of KDE developers, I think the outcome is that we're too concerned to
make "sleep" and "idle" inhibit lid switch behavior. Despite the difference in
behavior compared to systemd's own handling of the same inhibitors.
But we'll still want to fix "handle-lid-switch". Let me follow up in Bug 485623
as well.
I'd say we can regard the original issue as fixed, "sleep" and "idle" work as
they should to inhibit after inactivity. The existing lid switch behavior for
"sleep" and "idle" (i.e. ignoring these inhibitors to prevent overheating
laptops in bags) has been clarified as intentional.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
