Indeed https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1384746/comments/2
should be tracked else where. It really should split out into two
separate tracking issues.

1. either generating the feature file from the kernel on build. To track
this I have opened https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/217 to
track.

2. OS integration so that a kernel packages can build cache files on
install. To track this I have opened
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/218

** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues #217
   https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/217

** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues #218
   https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/218

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1384746

Title:
  Support multiple versions of AppArmor policy cache files

Status in AppArmor:
  Fix Released
Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The AppArmor parser should support multiple directories of policy
  cache files. Directories should be specific to a certain AppArmor
  kernel feature set.

  From a distro standpoint, this would allow policy caches to be created
  during kernel install/upgrade.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1384746/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to