This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-oem-5.14/5.14.0-1037.41
kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and
update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the
tag 'verification-needed-focal' to 'verification-done-focal'. If the
problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-focal' to
'verification-failed-focal'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: verification-needed-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969434

Title:
  build backport-iwlwifi-dkms as linux-modules-iwlwifi-ABI

Status in backport-iwlwifi-dkms package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux-meta package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux-meta-oem package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.14 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in backport-iwlwifi-dkms source package in Focal:
  New
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux-meta source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux-meta-oem source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in backport-iwlwifi-dkms source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in linux-meta source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in linux-meta-oem source package in Jammy:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Jammy:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [SRU Justfication]

  [Impact]

  Intel AX211 iwlwifi -64 firmware may fail to init under reboot stress,
  and -67 is immune. FW API -64 supported by oem-5.14, and -67 in v5.16.
  Not reproducible on every platform with AX211 installed, and the chances
  of such failures vary from one to another.

  [Fix]

  A few solutions were considered. The very first one is to ask Intel to
  fix -64 firmware directly, and the answer is a solid no claimed -64 is
  not the planned production version of AX211.

  It's also possible to backport FW API from v5.16, but while iwlwifi FW
  API is more or less a black box to us and the new FW APIs also depends
  on updates on the wireless stack, this is going to be very risky and
  actually we had regressions before after such backports.

  The last viable solution is to run backport-iwlwifi-dkms >= rev 8580 on
  the effected platforms. This means oem-5.14 and its migration target,
  hwe-5.15 will not be able to drive this piece of hw flawlessly without
  backport-iwlwifi-dkms installed.

  However, while we need secureboot to be enabled on these platforms,
  backport-iwlwifi-dkms must also be signed somehow. There are two
  possible method to achieve this, too. One, to prebuild this dkms as zfs
  and v4l2loopback does. However, while backport-iwlwifi-dkms generates
  kernel modules with exactly the same name as the in-tree ones, when
  prebuilt, they'll be available directly from the linux-modules package
  and therefore overrides the in-tree ones always, turning the in-tree
  driver completely useless and risk the stability of all other generic
  installations.

  The second one is to build backport-iwlwifi-dkms as nvidia graphic
  drivers in the linux-restricted-modules source package. In this way,
  affected platforms may install the corresponding packages when needed
  without interfering others. However, l-r-m is for restricted modules
  that needs special care of redistribution of its binaries, and
  backport-iwlwifi-dkms is GPL licensed.

  Here a similar but simpler process in the main kernel tree is
  re-implemented. Two additional packages,
  linux-modules-MODULE-PKGVER-ABINUM-FLAVOUR and its meta package
  linux-modules-MODULE-FLAVOUR will be created.

  [Test Case]

  Test builds:
  ./jammy/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-5.15.0-27-generic_5.15.0-27.28_amd64.deb
  ./jammy/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-generic_5.15.0-27.28_amd64.deb
  ./unstable/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-5.17.0-8-generic_5.17.0-8.8_amd64.deb
  ./unstable/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-generic_5.17.0-8.8_amd64.deb
  ./oem-5.17/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-5.17.0-1003-oem_5.17.0-1003.3_amd64.deb
  ./oem-5.17/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-oem_5.17.0-1003.3_amd64.deb
  
./oem-5.14/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-5.14.0-1033-oem_5.14.0-1033.36_amd64.deb
  ./oem-5.14/amd64/linux-modules-iwlwifi-oem_5.14.0-1033.36_amd64.deb

  [Where problems could occur]

  The latest (9858-0ubuntu2) backport-iwlwifi-dkms/jammy actually fails
  to build under this proposed process. Debdiff attached to the same
  bug.

  Different from nvidia packages built from l-r-m, the generated package
  names do not carry an additional short version string, e.g. nvidia-410,
  as there is no such necessity to build multiple versions of iwlwifi.
  The modules are installed to /lib/modules/<kver>/kernel/iwlwifi, not
  iwlwifi-9858/.

  ========== backport-iwlwifi-dkms SRU ==========

  In order to be compiled with dkms-build in kernel source package, the
  kernel header dir will not be /lib/modules/<version>/build but a
  temporary directory. This change specifies KLIB_BUILD from dkms
  variable ${kernel_source_dir}.

  [backport-iwlwifi-dkms]

  Under some circumstances, dkms is invoked as: `/usr/sbin/dkms build
  --kernelsourcedir ...` and yet the dkms make command in this package
  has:

    MAKE="'make' -j$(num_cpu_cores) KLIB=/lib/modules/$kernelver"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backport-iwlwifi-dkms/+bug/1969434/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to