** Description changed:

+ BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049634
+ 
  [Impact]
  
  Upon installing the 6.5 HWE kernel on Jammy, users with a custom wsize
  set will see data destruction when copying files from their systems onto
- a cifs smb 1.0 mount.
+ a cifs smb mount.
  
  wsize defaults to 65535 bytes, but when set to smaller values, like
  16850, users will see blocks of 16850 bytes copied over, followed by
  3900 binary zeros, followed by the next block of data followed by more
- binary zeros.
+ binary zeros. This destroys what you are copying, and the data
+ corruption is completely silent.
  
- A workaround is to increase wsize, but this only works for small files,
- as any files larger than wsize will see the bug.
+ A workaround is to set wsize to a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
  
- Most users will want to use the 6.2 HWE kernel until this is fixed.
+ [Fix]
+ 
+ This was fixed upstream in 6.8-rc5 by the following:
+ 
+ commit 4860abb91f3d7fbaf8147d54782149bb1fc45892
+ Author: Steve French <stfre...@microsoft.com>
+ Date: Tue Feb 6 16:34:22 2024 -0600
+ Subject: smb: Fix regression in writes when non-standard maximum write size 
negotiated
+ Link: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=4860abb91f3d7fbaf8147d54782149bb1fc45892
+ 
+ This patch has been selected for upstream stable.
+ 
+ The patch looks at wsize negotiation from the server, and also what is set on 
the mount command line, and if not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, rounds it down, 
taking care to not be 0.
+ The real corruption bug still exists in netfs/folios subsystems and we are 
looking for it still, but this solves the immediate data corruption issues on 
smb.
  
  [Testcase]
  
  Start two VMs, one for the server, and the other, the client.
  
  Server
  ------
  
  $ sudo apt update
  $ sudo apt upgrade
  $ sudo apt install samba
  $ sudo vim /etc/samba/smb.conf 
  server min protocol = NT1
  [sambashare]
      comment = Samba on Ubuntu
      path = /home/ubuntu/sambashare
      read only = no
      browsable = yes
  $ mkdir ~/sambashare
  $ sudo smbpasswd -a ubuntu
  
  Client
  ------
  
  $ sudo apt update
  $ sudo apt install cifs-utils
  $ mkdir ~/share
  $ sudo mount -t cifs -o username=ubuntu,vers=1.0,wsize=16850 
//192.168.122.172/sambashare ~/share
  $ ( set -o pipefail && head --bytes=$(( 55 * 1000 )) /dev/zero | openssl enc 
-aes-128-ctr -nosalt -pass "pass:my-seed" -iter 1 | hexdump --no-squeezing 
--format '40/1 "%02x"' --format '"\n"' >"testdata.txt" )
  $ sha256sum testdata.txt 
  9ec09af020dce3270ea76531141940106f173c7243b7193a553480fb8500b3f2  testdata.txt
  
  Now copy the file to the share.
  
  Client
  ------
  $ cp testdata.txt share/
  
  Server
  ------
  $ sha256sum sambashare/testdata.txt 
  9e573a0aa795f9cd4de4ac684a1c056dbc7d2ba5494d02e71b6225ff5f0fd866  
sambashare/testdata.txt
  
  The SHA256 hash is different. If you view the file with less, you will
  find a block of wsize=16850 bytes, then 3900 bytes of binary zeros,
  followed by another wsize=16850 bytes, then 3900 bytes of binary zeros,
  etc.
  
  An example of a broken file is:
  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/712573213/testdata-back-from-server.txt
  
  [Where problems could occur]
  
+ We are changing the wsize that the SMB server negotiates or the user
+ explicitly sets on the mount command line to a safe value, if the asked
+ for value was not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
+ 
+ It is unlikely that any users will notice any difference. If the wsize
+ happens to be rounded down to a significantly smaller number, there may
+ be a small performance impact, e.g. you set wsize=8094 for some reason,
+ it would round down to wsize=4096, and lead to double the writes. At
+ least you have data integrity though.
+ 
+ Most users default to wsize=65535, and will have no impact at all. Only
+ those with very old smb 1.0 servers that negotiate down to 16850 will
+ see any difference.
+ 
+ If a regression were to occur, it could result in user's wsize being
+ incorrectly set, leading to the underlying netfs/folios data corruption
+ being triggered and causing data corruption.
+ 
  [Other info]
  
- Currently bisecting. Introduced in 6.3-rc1. Currently broken on mainline
- 6.8-rc3.
+ The issue was introduced in 6.3-rc1 by:
+ 
+ commit d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2
+ Author: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
+ Date: Mon Jan 24 21:13:24 2022 +0000
+ Subject: cifs: Change the I/O paths to use an iterator rather than a page list
+ Link: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2
+ 
+ Upstream mailing list discussion:
+ 
+ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
+ 
cifs/6a65b2d1-7596-438a-8ade-2f7526b15...@rd10.de/T/#m22cd9b7289f87cd945978bd7995bcaf1beebfe67

** Tags added: mantic noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049634

Title:
  smb: wsize blocks of bytes followed with binary zeros on copy,
  destroying data

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049634

  [Impact]

  Upon installing the 6.5 HWE kernel on Jammy, users with a custom wsize
  set will see data destruction when copying files from their systems
  onto a cifs smb mount.

  wsize defaults to 65535 bytes, but when set to smaller values, like
  16850, users will see blocks of 16850 bytes copied over, followed by
  3900 binary zeros, followed by the next block of data followed by more
  binary zeros. This destroys what you are copying, and the data
  corruption is completely silent.

  A workaround is to set wsize to a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.

  [Fix]

  This was fixed upstream in 6.8-rc5 by the following:

  commit 4860abb91f3d7fbaf8147d54782149bb1fc45892
  Author: Steve French <stfre...@microsoft.com>
  Date: Tue Feb 6 16:34:22 2024 -0600
  Subject: smb: Fix regression in writes when non-standard maximum write size 
negotiated
  Link: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=4860abb91f3d7fbaf8147d54782149bb1fc45892

  This patch has been selected for upstream stable.

  The patch looks at wsize negotiation from the server, and also what is set on 
the mount command line, and if not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, rounds it down, 
taking care to not be 0.
  The real corruption bug still exists in netfs/folios subsystems and we are 
looking for it still, but this solves the immediate data corruption issues on 
smb.

  [Testcase]

  Start two VMs, one for the server, and the other, the client.

  Server
  ------

  $ sudo apt update
  $ sudo apt upgrade
  $ sudo apt install samba
  $ sudo vim /etc/samba/smb.conf 
  server min protocol = NT1
  [sambashare]
      comment = Samba on Ubuntu
      path = /home/ubuntu/sambashare
      read only = no
      browsable = yes
  $ mkdir ~/sambashare
  $ sudo smbpasswd -a ubuntu

  Client
  ------

  $ sudo apt update
  $ sudo apt install cifs-utils
  $ mkdir ~/share
  $ sudo mount -t cifs -o username=ubuntu,vers=1.0,wsize=16850 
//192.168.122.172/sambashare ~/share
  $ ( set -o pipefail && head --bytes=$(( 55 * 1000 )) /dev/zero | openssl enc 
-aes-128-ctr -nosalt -pass "pass:my-seed" -iter 1 | hexdump --no-squeezing 
--format '40/1 "%02x"' --format '"\n"' >"testdata.txt" )
  $ sha256sum testdata.txt 
  9ec09af020dce3270ea76531141940106f173c7243b7193a553480fb8500b3f2  testdata.txt

  Now copy the file to the share.

  Client
  ------
  $ cp testdata.txt share/

  Server
  ------
  $ sha256sum sambashare/testdata.txt 
  9e573a0aa795f9cd4de4ac684a1c056dbc7d2ba5494d02e71b6225ff5f0fd866  
sambashare/testdata.txt

  The SHA256 hash is different. If you view the file with less, you will
  find a block of wsize=16850 bytes, then 3900 bytes of binary zeros,
  followed by another wsize=16850 bytes, then 3900 bytes of binary
  zeros, etc.

  An example of a broken file is:
  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/712573213/testdata-back-from-server.txt

  [Where problems could occur]

  We are changing the wsize that the SMB server negotiates or the user
  explicitly sets on the mount command line to a safe value, if the
  asked for value was not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.

  It is unlikely that any users will notice any difference. If the wsize
  happens to be rounded down to a significantly smaller number, there
  may be a small performance impact, e.g. you set wsize=8094 for some
  reason, it would round down to wsize=4096, and lead to double the
  writes. At least you have data integrity though.

  Most users default to wsize=65535, and will have no impact at all.
  Only those with very old smb 1.0 servers that negotiate down to 16850
  will see any difference.

  If a regression were to occur, it could result in user's wsize being
  incorrectly set, leading to the underlying netfs/folios data
  corruption being triggered and causing data corruption.

  [Other info]

  The issue was introduced in 6.3-rc1 by:

  commit d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2
  Author: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
  Date: Mon Jan 24 21:13:24 2022 +0000
  Subject: cifs: Change the I/O paths to use an iterator rather than a page list
  Link: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=d08089f649a0cfb2099c8551ac47eef0cc23fdf2

  Upstream mailing list discussion:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
  
cifs/6a65b2d1-7596-438a-8ade-2f7526b15...@rd10.de/T/#m22cd9b7289f87cd945978bd7995bcaf1beebfe67

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2049634/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to